On Holy Disorders

When I was young, I conflated the story of Saint Maria Goretti with that of Saint Gemma of Galgani. The former, a woman who at 18 years of age while her parents were away at Mass refused the sexual advances of a young man who lived nearby.

So, he stabbed her multiple times. Her saintliness installed as a mark of her womanly virtue in resisting his overtures and because she was already saintly in word and deed. 

Not unlike Gemma, who did not suffer such a hideous fate, at least not in the first instance, but Hilary Mantel in her Memoir of my Former Self uses Gemma’s story, among others, to illustrate what she calls, ‘Holy Disorders’, namely holy anorexia.

The way these women, as part of their subjectivation to Jesus, not only purged their bodies of food, and suffered the stigmata on their wrists and feet – wounds that bled where nails were driven into Christ’s body – but also purged themselves of all desire. To get closer to his heavenliness and stay a step ahead of all things earthly. 

It was playtime during my fourth year at primary school when I visited the Church of Our Lady of Good Counsel. The church still stands today alongside the primary school where I spent at least six years of my early education from grade one till I shifted to the convent in year seven. 

The school sat in its concrete playground alongside the green manicured gardens beds that snaked around the church. No fence between, but a winding pathway alongside the rows of standard roses stripped of flowers post midyear prune, with the ground below freshly turned to fallow during the cold of winter. 

I can’t say why I decided to visit the church this day, most likely to escape the tumult of the playground and my abiding sense I had no friends.

Perhaps I was lonely and went in search of the company of saints whose ghosts inhabited the church and might well rustle about the aisles in the quiet of the morning when early Mass was over and no one else around. 

I entered through a side door, genuflecting. Then made a sign of the cross. My arms automatically took up this position at the holy water font in the doorway, as if checking my entire body for goodness.

Right hand to forehead. Then to stomach, across to left shoulder, then diagonally to right to complete the cross that is necessary in front of the altar where the Holy Eucharist rests snug in its gold tabernacle, pushed back against the altar stone.

The Church of Our lady of Good Counsel, like so many suburban churches of my childhood, was rectangular in shape with sections on one side that formed miniature replicas of altars where statues of saints, like Joseph or Mary, prevailed. 

Behind the main altar at the head of the church with stain glass windows overhead and flooded in the light of the morning sun, shadows danced against the wall.

The altar, separated on a dais, created a hidden corridor against this back wall. From there I imagined Christ would soon materialise to visit me. I’d recognise him from his long white robes and dark flowing hair, his beard and pale skin.

I prayed, knees against the hard wood of the kneeler, hands joined in prayer and my face towards the altar’s light. Then waited and waited. 

I had read the story of the three children of Fatima, the story of Bernadette, those children to whom the Blessed Virgin Mary once appeared with a series of promises and requests.

These young people, girls mostly, were famed throughout the church for their goodness and the fact they were chosen for visitation. I wanted my share, but to improve matters I was convinced mine would include a visit from Jesus. 

I waited until I heard the bell in the distance and sensed the call of the classroom with Mrs Alexander’s wrath if I was late. This greater than any disappointment in Jesus who failed to visit me.

Like so many childhood memories the rest fades from view. Until I read Hilary Mantel’s take on certain female saints who suffered immeasurable horrors in the name of abstinence.

Saint Bartolomea, took abjection to the extreme by licking floors and eating the spiders and other bugs she found there. She licked the floor till her tongue bled. Her blood a sign of her love of His sacred heart. 

In the fourteenth century, Lidwina, a Dutch mystic, the patron saint of chronic pain and ice-skating, kept her rotting flesh in jars during her bedridden state.

The Italian Saint Angela of Foligno ate scabs from a leper’s sores.

Catherine of Siena drank pus, while the Sacred Heart of Jesus glowed bright from many a church wall. A sword pieced its side. The heart exposed in Jesus’s hands was ringed by a crown of thorns to signify his suffering pre-crucifixion.

Along with the impulse to capitalise His masculine preposition. Not to do so, blasphemy. 

The old lessons sit hard in my psyche. When Hilary Mantel talks of the ‘medicalisation of unhappiness’, as when she was 19 years old and took herself to a doctor in search of help for the unbearable pain she had been experiencing since she first copped her period at eleven. He sent her to a psychiatrist.

Endometriosis did not exist then or was considered a psychological malady however much it took physical form. I remember my own experience of those who suffered such womanly ailments.

Just as the doctors dismissed Mantel’s pain as emotional, given the stress of life, put first on antidepressants then off to the psychiatrist, not diagnosed with endometriosis till it was too late when surgery and the removal of her ovaries left her in premature menopause and infertile. 

At Prince Henry’s Hospital in the social work department, we shared the prevailing medical view that endometriosis was essentially a psychological complaint. As if we too, women in the main, believed the clap trap of the medicos of the day, men mostly, who did not understand the fact that the female body with its tendency to menstruate and common ailment of such bodies, including those renegade cells in endometriosis that take themselves beyond the womb and could cause excruciating pain in the pelvic region. 

The doctors of my day considered endometriosis, like chronic thrush, to be an ailment of a person’s mind.

Similarly, a young woman whose life was dogged by chronic epilepsy and seizures -I’ll call her Gloria – was given the sad label of a woman who could not handle her emotions. Could not keep them in check. 

Gloria was demanding, excessive, a typical epileptic, or so we were told. She needed to be constrained with medication. No one used the throwback word ‘hysteric’ then, but they might as well have done so, both for epileptic seizures of the brain and for endometriosis those wandering cells away from the womb. 

Perhaps, because I was born into a female body and identified with the gender assigned to me at birth, I was prone to identifying with my female counterparts in these young female saints who worked hard to curb their desires and thereby get closer to Jesus.

They weren’t the only ones. Boys too were urged to emulate the lives of saints. And go through ritual punishments but they at least had a chance to become God’s representatives on earth, as priests, while we girls could only take the place of His handmaidens. 

How I despise the term ‘handmaiden’.

Spilt the word. Maiden: a young female, and hand. Whose hand? And where might we apply it? Other than to serve. The patriarchal nature of all religions goes without saying, but in the Catholic Church of my childhood it was pronounced from on high. My fantasy of a visit from Jesus an aberration. 

I should have better expected a visit from Jesus’s mother.

Mary visited small children. Jesus remained the province of men, however much the saints Mantel describes were desperately trying not so much to serve him, as to emulate Him, to become more Christlike in his suffering than Christ. 

What a way to go?

Keeping secrets

My mantra: write without expectation of any
outcome.  Write into the
unknown.  
Grade two, 1960, seven years old, pen in hand.
And then I go into a
non-fiction class where the facilitator reckons that anyone who can’t write five
sentences on what her book is about is in trouble, or words to that
effect.  I challenged the
notion.  
We are talking about
different processes and perhaps even different times in the life of a
book.  I may well still be at the
beginning whereas she’s talking about the end phase when the book needs to come
together. 
I stood over the cats this morning
as the boy tried to pinch the last of his sister’s food before he had decided
to leave.  He’s a real standover
merchant and so I stood over him, ordering him out of the house until his
sister had finished.
I told the non-fiction writer that
I love to write.  That was a
mistake.  Besides it is not true,
not entirely true.  I write because
I need to write, because not to write would leave me feeling as if my life has
no purpose or meaning.  
I write to
find that meaning and to make sense of my life, but that is not something I
love, not really.  It’s more like
something I am compelled to do, for the pleasure it gives – and indeed it gives
me pleasure – and also for the need.
Hilary Mantel in her essay, ‘Diary’ writes about her experience of hospitalisation for surgery that went
wrong.  She describes her
hallucinations, her ‘hallies’ as she calls them, as if they are real and no
doubt they were real to her when they appeared to her mid fever and pain.  But towards the end of her essay she
talks about her reservations about this writing.  As if she is fearful of being included among the so-called ‘confessional writers’, those who, to use her words, ‘chase their own ambulances’. 
Is that what it’s all about, this
writing of mine?  
I asked a friend
to define the expression.  ‘Chasing
your own ambulance’, as he understands it, means to go looking for an accident,
to write about your trauma, as if to bear witness, thereby encouraging the
reader also to bear witness.  
While
the word ‘confessional’, despite its religious connotations of admitting to
sin, can also mean the notion of disclosing something that has hitherto
remained hidden.  It has perhaps a
more neutral tone, though the notion of sharing secrets to me does not.
For some reason secrets carry the
weight of sin.  Why else keep
something secret unless somewhere along the road there is some sense that
someone has done wrong?  That
someone has something to hide and that something stirs up anxiety or fear.  
We don’t keep unimportant things secret. 
Keeping things secret takes an
effort, which is not to say there aren’t many things we might repress, seemingly
without effort.  They slip out of consciousness and only crop up when the
pressures they exert for exposure rise to the surface.  How did Freud term it? ‘the return of the repressed.’  But that’s not the same as deliberately keeping a secret, one that refuses to leave your consciousness.  
I have long tried to understand my
inability to learn while I was first at university from eighteen years of age
till I was twenty two and went out into the world to take on my first job.  Certainly numbers had me
flummoxed.  
In places they talk of a
female phobia of mathematics and perhaps of the sciences generally, that goes back in
time.  Certainly in my family my father’s
conviction that girls were good for nothing apart from housework, child rearing and
sexual comfort held sway.  
Despite this, my
mother read all her life.  She
still does.  But in my father’s
mind her reading was limited to trashy romance or pot boilers and religious
propaganda like the Catholic Tribune and the Advocate.
The education system within the
Catholic schools I attended both in my primary years and at secondary level
added to this fantasy of female inferiority.  
The focus was on
memory, which we polished with rote learning. Understanding why people might
behave as they do, as explored through English literature and history books,  came through a thick layer of religious conviction. 
For instance, Attila the Hun was a barbarian
who sought to overthrow the Christians. We read and rote learned the lives of
the saints and were encouraged to practice with sincerity and devotion, and an eye to our
calling as dedicated to others.  
If
we were not called to follow God as priests and nuns, then marriage was
the only option, marriage to another Catholic with whom we would bring up
several children, as did my mother, but she had married a convert.  Mixed marriages were then frowned upon. 
There was a system of rules in place that barred deeper explorations of the
meaning of things and I did not come to understand the meaning of the words, concepts and theories until much later in life.  
There were facts and religious beliefs, faith and goodness.  Others practised evil and wrong doing. 
We should not and that was all.  A black and white world, and one which I now prefer to avoid, especially in my writing, other than to describe it.